Federal Reserve Policy & Leadership — PolyBrief

Federal Reserve Policy & Leadership — PolyBrief | PolyBrief

Public Interest Questions

Fed decision in April?

Briefing

The Federal Reserve's April 28–29, 2026 FOMC meeting will be shaped by a policy environment that has been consistently cautious since the start of the year. At its January 28 meeting, the FOMC voted to hold the federal funds rate steady at 3.50–3.75%, pausing the rate-cutting cycle amid persistent inflation. Governor Christopher Waller dissented in favor of a 25-basis-point cut, and minutes released in mid-February revealed broader internal disagreement — including some members raising the possibility of rate increases — underscoring that the committee is far from unified on the path forward.

Economic data through late February has sent mixed signals that complicate any near-term easing. January CPI came in at 2.4% year-on-year, below expectations, while the Fed's preferred PCE gauge stood at 2.9% in December — still well above the 2% target. The labor market added 130,000 jobs in January, pushing unemployment to 4.3%, reducing urgency for cuts. Meanwhile, Q4 GDP growth of just 1.4% — well below the 2.5% forecast — has renewed debate about whether the economy can sustain the current rate level. A Fed study released February 12 found that roughly 90% of tariff costs fall on U.S. consumers and businesses, adding an inflationary wildcard tied to trade policy that could keep the Fed on hold longer than anticipated.

Multiple Fed officials — including Governors Barr and Waller and regional presidents Goolsbee, Logan, and Daly — signaled in mid-to-late February that rates are likely to remain unchanged for some time, with the March 17–18 meeting widely expected to produce another hold. If March is indeed a hold, the April meeting would represent the third consecutive pause, and the bar for a cut by then would require meaningful disinflation progress and/or labor market softening between now and late April. Governor Miran has been the clearest dissenting voice, forecasting four 25-basis-point cuts across 2026 and arguing policy is tighter than understood — but his view appears to be an outlier within the committee.

Key uncertainties heading into April include the trajectory of tariff-driven inflation, the pace of labor market cooling, whether Powell's successor is confirmed before the meeting (Powell's term expires May 2026), and the degree to which sustained political pressure from the White House and Treasury influences the institutional posture of the Fed. The dominant signal from current data and Fed communications points toward no change at the April meeting, though a deteriorating growth outlook or a sharp drop in inflation could shift that calculus before the end of April.

Evidence (14 stories)

Powell Deflects Political Questions at Post-Meeting Press ConferenceJan 25 · 6 news events · 156 articles

鲍威尔发声_腾讯新闻112 articles

연준 파월 "美성장세 분명히 개선...견조한 기반서 올해 시작"(종합)16 articles

Fed Başkanı Powell: Enflasyon ve istihdam riskleri azaldı10 articles

Πάουελ: "Δεν έχω τίποτα για εσάς σήμερα"7 articles

Powell: tarifas podem ter provocado apenas um aumento pontual nos preços nos EUA6 articles

+ 1 more

Fed decision in March?

Briefing

The Federal Reserve is widely expected to hold interest rates steady at its March 17–18, 2026 FOMC meeting, with the federal funds rate remaining at its current target range of 3.50–3.75%. The January 28 meeting set the tone: the FOMC voted to pause its rate-cutting cycle amid persistent inflation, with Chair Jerome Powell citing solid economic conditions while acknowledging that both inflation and employment risks had moderated. The lone dissent came from Governor Christopher Waller, who favored a 25-basis-point cut — a signal of internal division but not of majority sentiment favoring near-term easing.

Incoming economic data through late February has reinforced the case for a March hold. January CPI came in at 2.4% year-on-year — below expectations — offering some encouragement, but the Fed's preferred PCE gauge stood at 2.9% in December, well above the 2% target. The labor market added a stronger-than-expected 130,000 jobs in January, pushing unemployment to 4.3%, reducing any urgency to cut. GDP growth of just 1.4% in Q4 2025 introduced some concern about economic momentum, but has not been sufficient to shift the committee's cautious posture. A Fed study released February 12 found that roughly 90% of tariff costs fall on U.S. consumers and businesses, adding an inflationary wildcard that further complicates the rate path.

Multiple Fed officials signaled in mid-to-late February that rates are likely to remain on hold for some time. Governors Barr and Waller, along with regional presidents Goolsbee, Logan, and Daly, all communicated caution, citing persistent inflation and labor market resilience. None indicated urgency for a March cut. The notable outlier is Governor Stephen Miran, who argued in early February that policy is tighter than understood and forecast four 25-basis-point cuts across 2026 — though his view appears to represent a minority position within the committee.

The key uncertainties heading into March center on whether tariff-driven inflation materializes more sharply than expected, whether labor market conditions soften, and how the Fed navigates sustained political pressure from the executive branch — including public criticism from President Trump and a Treasury Department accusation in early February that the Fed had lost public trust. Powell's term expires in May 2026, adding a leadership transition dimension to the institutional backdrop. Minutes from the January meeting revealed that some officials even discussed the possibility of rate increases, underscoring the breadth of internal debate. Barring a significant deterioration in economic data before March 18, the balance of evidence points firmly toward no change at the upcoming meeting.

Fed decisions (Dec-Mar)

Briefing

The Federal Reserve has now completed two of the three FOMC meetings covered by this question. At its January 28 meeting, the FOMC voted to hold the federal funds rate steady at 3.50–3.75%, pausing the rate-cutting cycle that had been underway. Governor Christopher Waller dissented, arguing for a 25-basis-point cut, signaling internal division. Minutes released in mid-February revealed broader disagreement among officials, with some members even raising the possibility of rate increases — a notable hawkish signal within the committee.

Heading into the March 17–18 meeting, multiple Fed officials have signaled that rates are likely to remain on hold. Governors Barr and Waller and regional presidents Goolsbee, Logan, and Daly all indicated in mid-to-late February that persistent inflation and a resilient labor market argue against near-term easing. Economic data through late February presents a mixed picture: January CPI came in below expectations at 2.4% year-on-year, but the Fed's preferred PCE gauge rose 2.9% in December, the labor market added a stronger-than-expected 130,000 jobs in January, and Q4 GDP growth was a weak 1.4%. The IMF projected just one Fed rate cut in 2026, while internal Fed forecasts ranged from zero to four cuts.

Political pressure on the Fed has intensified significantly. President Trump publicly attacked Chair Powell following the January hold, and the Treasury Department accused the Fed of losing public trust over inflation. Fed Governor Stephen Miran — a recent Trump appointee — argued that policy is tighter than understood and forecast four 25-basis-point cuts in 2026, also stating the Fed does not have absolute independence. These pressures complicate the institutional backdrop but have not, as of late February, shifted the majority of officials toward imminent easing.

The key uncertainty for the March meeting centers on whether incoming inflation and employment data between now and March 17 will shift the calculus. The combination of sticky PCE inflation, tariff-driven price pressures (a Fed study found 90% of tariff costs fall on U.S. consumers), and a still-solid labor market suggests the most likely outcome at March is another pause — making a Pause-Pause-Pause sequence the path of least resistance for the full December-to-March window. However, the weak GDP print and the dissent within the committee leave the door open to a cut if conditions deteriorate.

Fed rate cut by...?

Briefing

The Federal Reserve held its federal funds rate steady at 3.50–3.75% at the January 28, 2026 FOMC meeting, meaning the market question of whether a rate cut would occur between December 16, 2025 and the conclusion of that January meeting resolves to **No**. The FOMC voted to pause its rate-cutting cycle, with Chair Powell citing solid economic footing and improved U.S. growth prospects since December, while acknowledging that inflation and employment risks had diminished. The sole dissent came from Governor Christopher Waller, who argued the committee should have cut rates by 25 basis points — underscoring that the hold was a deliberate majority decision rather than a unanimous one.

The backdrop to the January hold was a mix of persistent inflation and resilient labor market data that gave the committee reason for caution. The Fed's preferred inflation gauge, the PCE price index, rose 2.9% year-over-year in December, well above the 2% target. Meanwhile, the U.S. economy added 130,000 non-farm payroll jobs in January, and unemployment fell to 4.3%, reducing the urgency for near-term easing. A Fed study released February 12 also found that roughly 90% of U.S. tariff costs fall on American consumers, adding an inflationary wrinkle to the policy calculus.

Political pressure on the Fed intensified following the hold. President Trump publicly called Powell an "idiot" and demanded sharp rate cuts, while the Treasury Department accused the Fed of losing public trust over the inflation surge. Despite this pressure, Powell has maintained the Fed's institutional independence, and minutes from the January meeting — released in mid-February — revealed that some officials even raised the possibility of rate increases, reflecting the breadth of internal disagreement. Governor Miran offered a contrasting view, forecasting four 25-basis-point cuts across 2026 and arguing current policy is tighter than understood, but his outlook remains an outlier within the committee.

Looking ahead to the March 17–18 FOMC meeting, multiple officials — including Governors Barr and Waller and regional presidents Goolsbee, Logan, and Daly — signaled in late February that rates are likely to remain on hold for some time. A below-expectations January CPI reading of 2.4% has kept the door open to cuts later in the year, but the combination of sticky PCE inflation, a strong labor market, and tariff-related price pressures leaves the Fed's next move deeply uncertain. The key unresolved question is whether softening growth data — Q4 GDP came in at just 1.4%, well below the 2.5% forecast — will eventually tip the balance toward easing.

How many Fed rate cuts in 2026?

Briefing

The Federal Reserve entered 2026 on a cautious footing, holding rates steady at 3.50–3.75% at its January 28 meeting amid persistent inflation and a solid labor market. The decision was not unanimous — Governor Christopher Waller dissented in favor of a 25-basis-point cut — and minutes released in mid-February revealed broader internal disagreement, with some officials even raising the possibility of rate increases. This internal division underscores how unsettled the rate path remains heading into the rest of the year.

Economic data through February has sent mixed signals. January CPI came in at 2.4% year-on-year, below expectations, offering some encouragement on the inflation front. However, the Fed's preferred PCE gauge rose 2.9% in December, the labor market added a stronger-than-expected 130,000 jobs in January with unemployment falling to 4.3%, and Q4 GDP growth came in at a weak 1.4%. This combination of sticky inflation and slowing growth has left policymakers in a difficult position, with multiple Fed officials — including Governors Barr and Waller and regional presidents Goolsbee, Logan, and Daly — signaling in February that rates are likely to remain on hold for some time. The March 17–18 FOMC meeting is widely expected to produce another hold.

Internal Fed forecasts for 2026 cuts range widely, from zero to four. Governor Stephen Miran, in a notable departure from consensus, argued in early February that policy is tighter than understood and forecast four 25-basis-point cuts totaling one percentage point in 2026. The IMF, by contrast, projected just one cut, citing risks from tariff and immigration policies. A Fed study released February 12 found that approximately 90% of U.S. tariff costs fall on American consumers, reinforcing concerns that trade policy could sustain inflationary pressure and keep the Fed on hold longer than some anticipate.

The political environment adds further complexity. President Trump has publicly attacked Chair Powell and demanded sharp rate cuts, while the Treasury Department accused the Fed of losing public trust over inflation — escalating institutional pressure on the central bank as Powell's term approaches its May 2026 expiration. The Fed has so far maintained its independence, but the leadership transition itself introduces uncertainty about the future rate path. Taken together, the evidence points toward a cautious, data-dependent Fed that is more likely to cut fewer times in 2026 than the more aggressive forecasts suggest, though the range of plausible outcomes remains wide.

Jerome Powell out as Fed Chair by...?

Briefing

Jerome Powell's tenure as Federal Reserve Chair is under mounting pressure from multiple directions, though his formal departure before May 2026 — when his term as Chair expires — remains uncertain. The clearest development is President Trump's nomination of former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh as Powell's successor, announced in late January 2026. With a named replacement already moving through the confirmation process, the question has shifted from *whether* Powell will be replaced to *when* exactly the transition occurs and whether it proceeds on the normal schedule.

The political environment surrounding Powell has grown increasingly hostile. Following the Fed's January 28 rate hold, Trump publicly called Powell an "idiot" and demanded sharp rate cuts, continuing a pattern of executive pressure on the central bank. The Treasury Department escalated this further on February 5, formally accusing the Fed of losing public trust by allowing high inflation — a notable escalation given that the criticism came from a co-equal financial institution rather than solely the White House. Powell, for his part, has maintained the Fed's independence and declined to engage on politically sensitive questions at his post-meeting press conference.

Adding legal complexity, federal prosecutors are continuing a DOJ investigation into Powell related to a $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed's Washington headquarters, as reported on January 29. Legal experts have noted this inquiry could provide a pretext for removal or resignation before his term ends, particularly in light of a Supreme Court case examining presidential authority to remove heads of independent agencies. If courts were to expand that removal power, the legal barrier to ousting Powell before May 2026 could diminish significantly.

The Warsh confirmation process itself faces friction — Senate tensions, scrutiny over a criminal inquiry, and the surfacing of Warsh's name in Epstein-related documents have complicated the timeline. The key uncertainty is whether Powell exits on schedule in May 2026 or is pushed out earlier through legal, political, or institutional pressure. The convergence of a DOJ investigation, aggressive White House rhetoric, and an advancing confirmation process for his successor makes the situation unusually volatile, but no confirmed early departure has occurred as of the latest reporting.

Who will Trump nominate as Fed Chair?

Briefing

The question of who will serve as the next Federal Reserve Chair has moved from speculation to a concrete nomination. On or around January 26, President Trump formally nominated Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor and longtime Trump ally with Wall Street credentials, to lead the Federal Reserve. The nomination came against a backdrop of sustained executive branch pressure on incumbent Chair Jerome Powell, whom Trump publicly called an "idiot" in February and repeatedly pressured to cut rates following the Fed's January 28 decision to hold the federal funds rate steady at 3.50–3.75%.

Warsh's confirmation process is now underway but faces notable headwinds. The Senate Banking Committee agreed in late January to advance confirmation hearings following pressure from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, though friction with at least one Senate Republican — Senator Thom Tillis — prompted the White House to accuse him of holding the economy "hostage." Adding further complication, Warsh's name surfaced in documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein files shortly after the nomination was announced, introducing an unexpected controversy. The confirmation hearings are being closely watched as a test of both Warsh's policy views and the broader question of Fed independence.

Powell's position in the interim remains legally and politically precarious. A DOJ investigation into a $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed's Washington headquarters, reported as ongoing as of January 29, has added legal scrutiny to the transition. His term as Chair is set to expire in May 2026, meaning the confirmation timeline for Warsh carries practical urgency. The Treasury Department separately escalated pressure on the Fed in early February by publicly accusing it of losing the public's confidence over the inflation surge — an unusual broadside from a co-equal financial authority.

The direction of events points clearly toward Warsh as the nominee, with the central uncertainty now residing in the Senate confirmation process rather than the identity of the nominee. Key unresolved questions include whether the Epstein file controversy or the criminal inquiry referenced in committee proceedings will materially affect Republican support, whether the White House-Senate tensions can be managed, and how Warsh's proposed Fed-Treasury accord — modeled on the 1951 agreement — will be received by senators attentive to the Fed's institutional independence.

Briefing

This briefing focuses on the selected topic and condenses the developments shown in its timeline into one readable narrative.

The Federal Reserve's leadership transition has reached a decisive stage, with President Trump having nominated former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh as the next Chair while incumbent Jerome Powell faces a convergence of political pressure, legal scrutiny, and an approaching end to his term in May 2026. The nomination of Warsh has set off a broad reassessment of where U.S. monetary policy is headed, even as the confirmation process has already encountered significant turbulence in the Senate.

The sequence of events accelerating this transition began in earnest at the Fed's January 28 meeting, when the FOMC voted to hold the federal funds rate steady at 3.50–3.75%, pausing a rate-cutting cycle amid persistent inflation. Governor Christopher Waller dissented, favoring a 25-basis-point cut — a signal of internal divisions that was reinforced when mid-February meeting minutes revealed some officials had even discussed the possibility of rate increases. Powell, at his post-meeting press conference, declined to engage on politically sensitive questions, a posture that reflected his broader effort to insulate the institution from White House pressure. That effort was immediately tested: Trump publicly called Powell an "idiot" and demanded sharp rate reductions, while simultaneously claiming it would be "inappropriate" to pressure his own nominee — a contradiction that underscored the unusual political environment surrounding the Fed.

Trump's formal nomination of Warsh followed shortly after, triggering intense market and policy analysis. Warsh, a former Fed governor with close ties to Wall Street and to Trump, has proposed a new Fed-Treasury accord modeled on the landmark 1951 agreement — a concept that drew particular attention from bond market participants who interpreted it as potentially constraining the Fed's use of quantitative easing or restructuring its asset holdings. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent moved to temper expectations, stating he does not anticipate rapid balance sheet reduction even after the leadership change. Trump, for his part, made headlines at the Alfalfa Club dinner by joking that he would sue Warsh if rates were not lowered, and by claiming the economy could grow 15 percent under Warsh's leadership — a figure economists broadly dismissed.

The confirmation process has proven contentious from the outset. The Senate Banking Committee agreed in early February to advance hearings following direct pressure from Bessent, but friction between the White House and Senate Republicans quickly surfaced. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt accused Senator Thom Tillis of holding the economy "hostage" over the nomination dispute, and Warsh's candidacy was further complicated when his name appeared in documents connected to the Jeffrey Epstein files — an unexpected development that added reputational scrutiny to an already fraught process. The episode illustrated how even a Republican-controlled Senate may not provide smooth passage for a nominee perceived as too closely tied to White House preferences.

Evidence (14 stories)

Powell Deflects Political Questions at Post-Meeting Press ConferenceJan 25 · 6 news events · 156 articles

鲍威尔发声_腾讯新闻112 articles

연준 파월 "美성장세 분명히 개선...견조한 기반서 올해 시작"(종합)16 articles

Fed Başkanı Powell: Enflasyon ve istihdam riskleri azaldı10 articles

Πάουελ: "Δεν έχω τίποτα για εσάς σήμερα"7 articles

Powell: tarifas podem ter provocado apenas um aumento pontual nos preços nos EUA6 articles

+ 1 more

Timeline

Thursday, February 5, 2026

Treasury Accuses Fed of Losing Public Trust Over Inflation Surge

The U.S. Treasury Department accused the Federal Reserve of losing the confidence of the American public by allowing the highest inflation in decades, escalating political pressure on the central bank.

5 articles

The U.S. Treasury Department publicly accused the Federal Reserve of losing the confidence of the American public by allowing the highest inflation in decades to take hold. The criticism adds to the sustained pattern of executive branch pressure on the Fed as it navigates a leadership transition and ongoing debate over the rate path. The accusation is notable given that it came from the Treasury — a co-equal financial authority — rather than solely from the White House, and it further complicates the Fed's effort to maintain its institutional independence.

Underlying stories (1)

U.S. Treasury Accuses Fed of Losing Public Trust Over Inflation SurgeFeb 5 · 1 news events · 5 articles

The U.S. Treasury Department accused the Federal Reserve of losing the confidence of the American public by allowing the highest inflation in decades to take hold. The criticism adds to broader political pressure on the Fed as it navigates a leadership transition.

News events (1)

Федрезерв США обвинили в выпуске "волшебных денег"

5 articlesView articles

Friday, January 30, 2026

Warsh Confirmation Advances Amid Scrutiny and Senate Tensions

The Senate Banking Committee agreed to advance Kevin Warsh's confirmation hearings despite a criminal inquiry and friction between the White House and Senate Republicans.

143 articles

The Senate Banking Committee agreed to move forward with confirmation hearings for Kevin Warsh following pressure from Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, despite ongoing scrutiny related to a criminal inquiry. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt accused Senator Thom Tillis of holding the U.S. economy 'hostage' amid a dispute over the nomination, escalating tensions between the White House and Senate Republicans. Shortly after the nomination was announced, Warsh's name also surfaced in documents related to the Jeffrey Epstein files, adding an unexpected controversy to his candidacy. The confirmation process is being closely watched as a potential flashpoint in the broader debate over Fed independence.

Jan 30 – Feb 13, 2026

Underlying stories (3)

Thursday, January 29, 2026

DOJ Investigation Into Powell's Fed Renovation Continues

Federal prosecutors are continuing their investigation into Fed Chair Jerome Powell over a $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed's Washington headquarters.

10 articles

Federal prosecutors are continuing their investigation into Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell related to a $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed's Washington, D.C. headquarters. The investigation adds legal scrutiny to an already politically charged leadership transition, with Powell's term as Chair set to expire in May 2026. Legal experts have noted that the DOJ inquiry could provide a pretext for removal or resignation, intersecting with a Supreme Court case examining the scope of presidential power to remove heads of independent agencies. The combination of legal and political pressures has injected unusual uncertainty into the question of whether Powell will serve out his full term.

Underlying stories (1)

Monday, January 26, 2026

Trump Nominates Kevin Warsh as Next Federal Reserve Chair

President Trump nominated former Fed Governor Kevin Warsh to lead the Federal Reserve, triggering intense debate over the future direction of monetary policy and the Fed's independence.

3694 articles

President Trump nominated Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor and longtime Trump ally with Wall Street credentials, as the next Federal Reserve Chair, setting off widespread analysis of how his leadership could reshape monetary policy. Markets initially priced in the possibility of more aggressive rate cuts under Warsh, but those expectations moderated as stronger economic data and hawkish signals reduced the likelihood of early easing. Warsh has proposed a new Fed-Treasury accord modeled on the historic 1951 agreement, drawing significant attention from bond market participants who see it as potentially restricting quantitative easing or restructuring the Fed's asset holdings. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated he does not expect the Fed to move quickly on balance sheet reduction even after the leadership change. Trump separately joked at the Alfalfa Club dinner that he would sue Warsh if he failed to lower rates, and claimed the economy could grow 15% under a Warsh-led Fed — a figure economists widely dismissed.

Jan 26 – Feb 26, 2026

Underlying stories (7)

Sunday, January 25, 2026

Trump Attacks Powell, Demands Rate Cuts After Fed Hold

President Trump publicly called Powell an 'idiot' and demanded sharp rate reductions following the Fed's January decision to hold rates steady, intensifying political pressure on the central bank.

493 articles

Following the Fed's January rate hold, President Trump renewed his attacks on Chair Jerome Powell, calling him an 'idiot' and demanding immediate, sharp rate cuts. Trump also claimed that a 'Democrat shutdown' had cost the economy two percentage points of GDP growth, and separately said it would be 'inappropriate' to pressure his Fed Chair nominee to cut rates — even as he continued pressuring Powell. Powell, for his part, has worked to shield the Fed from political interference, maintaining the central bank's independence on monetary policy decisions as his term approaches its May 2026 expiration. The pattern of executive branch criticism has drawn sustained attention to the question of Fed independence.

Jan 25 – Feb 20, 2026

Underlying stories (3)

Fed Holds Rates in January; Powell Deflects Political Questions

The Federal Reserve held rates steady at 3.50–3.75% at its January 28 meeting, with Powell citing solid economic footing while refusing to engage on politically sensitive topics.

1336 articles

The FOMC voted to hold the federal funds rate at 3.50–3.75% at its January 28 meeting, pausing the rate-cutting cycle amid persistent inflation. At his post-meeting press conference, Powell said inflation and employment risks had diminished and that U.S. growth prospects had improved since December, but declined to answer questions on politically sensitive matters. Governor Christopher Waller dissented, arguing the committee should have cut rates by 25 basis points, highlighting internal divisions over the pace of easing. Minutes from the meeting, released in mid-February, revealed broader disagreement among officials about the timing and extent of future cuts, with some members even raising the possibility of rate increases.

Jan 25 – Feb 18, 2026

Underlying stories (4)

Powell Deflects Political Questions at Post-Meeting Press ConferenceJan 25 · 6 news events · 156 articles

Evidence (16 stories)

Powell Deflects Political Questions at Post-Meeting Press ConferenceJan 25 · 6 news events · 156 articles

鲍威尔发声_腾讯新闻112 articles

연준 파월 "美성장세 분명히 개선...견조한 기반서 올해 시작"(종합)16 articles

Fed Başkanı Powell: Enflasyon ve istihdam riskleri azaldı10 articles

Πάουελ: "Δεν έχω τίποτα για εσάς σήμερα"7 articles

Powell: tarifas podem ter provocado apenas um aumento pontual nos preços nos EUA6 articles

+ 1 more

Fed Holds Rates Steady at January Meeting; Powell Signals Cautious OutlookJan 26 · 23 news events · 962 articles

Fed Holds Rates Steady, Nods to Stabilization in Jobless Rate279 articles

Super quarta concentra decisões de juros no Brasil e nos Estados Unidos132 articles

米FRB、金利据え置き　パウエル議長は中銀としての独立性を強調130 articles

금리 동결 선택한 美연준...연 3.5~3.75%91 articles

Asian shares are mixed after Wall St sets a record, and the US...78 articles

+ 18 more

Waller Dissents at January FOMC Meeting, Calls for 25 Basis Point Rate CutJan 28 · 3 news events · 99 articles

금리 동결 선택한 美연준...연 3.5~3.75%91 articles

Waller'den Faiz İndirimi Çağrısı - Son Dakika5 articles

Fed's Waller dissents, calls for 25 basis point rate cut By Investing.com3 articles

January CPI Comes in Below Expectations, Boosting Rate Cut BetsFeb 10 · 6 news events · 171 articles

美国1月份CPI上涨2.4% 低于预期 | 美国通胀 | 大纪元71 articles

全线反弹！加密货币大涨，超9万人爆仓_腾讯新闻36 articles

Key inflation measure hits level not seen in five years30 articles

Inflation eased slightly in January but remained well above the Fed's target19 articles

US-Inflation sinkt im Januar 2026 auf 2,4 Prozent9 articles

+ 1 more

Strong U.S. January Jobs Report Reinforces Case for Fed PauseFeb 10 · 4 news events · 33 articles

Forte geração de vagas nos EUA afasta ainda mais possível corte de juros em março15 articles

Criação de vagas de trabalho nos EUA acelera em janeiro, taxa de desemprego cai para 4,3%8 articles

美 고용 '깜짝 호조' - 매일경제5 articles

US-Arbeitsmarkt belebt sich kräftig5 articles

U.S. PCE Inflation Ticks Up to 2.9% in December, Keeping Fed CautiousFeb 18 · 1 news events · 9 articles

États-Unis : l'inflation s'est légèrement accélérée au mois de décembre, à 2,9% sur un an9 articles

March 2026 FOMC Meeting in Focus as Markets Assess Rate OutlookFeb 10 · 3 news events · 24 articles

Asian Stocks Set to Extend Rally as US Shares Slip: Markets Wrap11 articles

Yhdysvaltain keskuspankki ei laskenut korkoja - Trumpin arvellaan nimittävän uuden johtajan pian7 articles

FED faiz kararı ne zaman açıklanacak? 2026 FED mart ayı faiz kararı toplantısı6 articles

Fed Officials Signal Rates Likely on Hold as Inflation Concerns PersistFeb 10 · 12 news events · 143 articles

Fed's Barr signals rates to hold steady amid inflation concerns By Investing.com31 articles

Fed's Daly says AI impact on productivity needs deeper analysis By Investing.com21 articles

US-Schlussglocke: Fed-Stimmen bremsen - Coca-Cola fällt - On Semi dreht - Spotify hebt ab20 articles

Quan chức Fed: Lãi suất có thể thấp hơn nữa trong năm 202614 articles

インフレ低下「慎重ながらも楽観視」＝米ダラス連銀総裁（ロイター）9 articles

+ 7 more

Miran Resigns as CEA Chair to Remain at Federal ReserveFeb 3 · 4 news events · 91 articles

Trump adviser Stephen Miran quits White House role to stay on at Fed63 articles

ミラン米ＦＲＢ理事、ＣＥＡ委員長職を辞任11 articles

Miran, do Fed, renuncia ao cargo na Casa Branca10 articles

Thống đốc Fed rời chức vụ tại Nhà Trắng7 articles

Fed's Miran Says Policy Too Tight, Tariffs Will Push Rates LowerFeb 9 · 2 news events · 32 articles

Fed policy is tighter than thought, inflation not a problem, Miran says23 articles

Miran diz que Fed não tem independência absoluta e que tarifas farão juros caírem nos EUA9 articles

+ 6 more stories